The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug


Action  Adventure  Fantasy  

Rotten Tomatoes Critics - fresh 74%
Rotten Tomatoes Audience - upright 86%
IMDb Rating 7.9


Uploaded By: OTTO
December 14, 2020 at 10:00 pm



Evangeline Lilly as Tauriel
Benedict Cumberbatch as Smaug / Necromancer
Cate Blanchett as Galadriel
Lee Pace as Thranduil
720p 1080p 3D
993.16 MB
23.976 fps
2hr 41 min
P/S 109 / 427
2.06 GB
23.976 fps
2hr 41 min
P/S 166 / 899
n 1920*800 n
n Chinese n
n PG-13 n
n 23.976 fps n
n 2hr 41 min n
P/S 14 / 46

Movie Reviews

Reviewed by n/a 9 / 10

Decent fantasy-action slightly inspired by The Hobbit

*** This review may contain spoilers ***

Reviewed by n/a 9 / 10

The word you're looking for is "reimagining"

Most reviews will tell you what's so great about this movie and why it's worth watching, but I figured you should hear the other side of the story.First of all a small note for Tolkien fans. If you thought An Unexpected Journey strayed a bit too far from the book: The Desolation of Smaug looks like the script writers didn't even know there was a book. The movie tries hard to change the story wherever it can, reducing fan-favorite chapters to 5 minute scenes and writing new content that feels out of place.But it's not only bad if you've read the book. I really wonder what the target audience is, because it feels like it's written for 15 year old boys. There are random action scenes every 10 minutes and 'funny' decapitations every 30. The worst thing here is that the action comes at the cost of character development. You have a band of 13 Dwarfs and a Hobbit, yet you rarely see them interact.Now I like Elves more than Dwarfs, so I didn't mind seeing so much of them in this movie. But having them show up in every place to save the day feels wrong. Perhaps Peter Jackson thought his cast of Dwarfs wasn't good enough to create an enjoyable movie? Gandalf's scenes in Dol Guldur were an interesting addition in concept, but they are just too slow. I feel his scenes mostly serve as an attempt to raise The Hobbit to The Lord of the Rings' level of epicness. And that just doesn't work.The story is full of illogicalities. How does entering the mountain to steal the Arkenstone to unite the Dwarfs to kill the Dragon to enter the mountain work exactly?? And remember that heartwarming last scene of An Unexpected Journey, where Thorin finally accepts Bilbo? Well, that's all gone again. Even though he keeps outsmarting all the Dwarfs, Bilbo is back to being an unappreciated 5th wheel of the party. And did the writers really think viewers would be so desperate for a love story that they'd enjoy an Elf and a Dwarf flirting it up? Their scenes feel forced and are painful to watch.Martin Freeman's acting is top notch again, but sadly he hardly gets any screen time. He only shines in his scene with Smaug. Now Smaug as a character is awesome, no complaints there. Yet most of his scenes are way too dragged out. There's a 20 minute scene with the Dwarfs running around thinking they can defeat him. Only at that point the movie already hinted at the only possible way of defeating him. Perhaps the worst aspect is that these scenes make Smaug look like an unintelligent creature. Dwarfs luring a Dragon around by going "Nana-nanana you can't catch me!" is not only silly and cliché, it's an insult to Smaug's character.Final complaint: the whole movie builds up to a scene.... that's apparently going to be the opening scene of movie 3. Nobody in the cinema was sure if the movie had ended, or there was just an awkwardly long pause when the screen went black.A movie like this you'll want to see, no matter how good or bad it is. You can't miss out on such a huge release, especially when it looks gorgeous in HFR 3D. But where I watched each Lord of the Rings movie 3 times in cinema, watching The Desolation of Smaug just once was enough for me.In the end, most problems of the movie seem to stem from the decision to turn the cute Hobbit tale into three epic movies that have to live up to the Lord of the Rings hype. It doesn't work.

Reviewed by n/a 9 / 10

The Desolation of CGI - the Hobbit trilogy continues to disappoint

I won't "review" the content of the movie in any detail, but provide some thoughts about how this film should be approached. I consider myself a Tolkienist (in fact I saw this movie on opening night because I secured a promotion deal with the local cinema: I spent four hours until midnight writing people's names in Elvish writing!) It is to be expected that many fans of of the original book will perceive this movie as a bloated, garbled monster version of the written story they loved. It is important to realize, before going in, that this is not simply "the movie of the book". This is Jackson's The Hobbit, not Tolkien's, and they are best appreciated as independent works. They represent different media, come from different centuries, and have partly different target audiences. The children's book was written before Tolkien had any idea of the grand trilogy to follow; Jackson had already produced his Lord of the Rings trilogy and somewhat understandably tries to make the prequels resemble it, in tone and scope.One could argue that Jackson's Hobbit trilogy, when complete, will set up the LotR film trilogy far better than Tolkien's simple children's book sets up the literary LotR. (The change in tone from children's book to grand epic is VERY pronounced, even grating for those who try to read The Hobbit after finishing LotR.) Incidentally, Jackson's prequel trilogy apparently will not spoil the LotR trilogy the way the Star Wars prequels give away important plot points of the original movies. When finished, Jackson's six Middle-earth movies can be profitably watched in sequence of internal chronology.To be sure, Jackson's Hobbit trilogy is "based on" the 1930s children's book in the sense that the characters have the same names and visit much the same places in somewhat the same order (though new characters and places are also added). Their basic motivations are also the same. But beyond that, one should not expect much "fidelity". There is hardly anything that isn't greatly embellished and vastly elaborated, mostly so as to allow for a FAR darker tone and MUCH more fantasy action (i.e., fights). The spiders of Mirkwood here approach actual horror, as compared to their rather more children-friendly literary counterparts (where we have Bilbo insulting them with silly "Attercop" rhymes).The wizards' conflict with the Necromancer of Dol Guldur, which in the book happens entirely "offscreen" and is just briefly alluded to when Gandalf has returned near the end, is here actually shown. This is understandable; Gandalf would otherwise be completely absent for much of this movie. Also, Jackson's audience will already know that this is the start of the war with Sauron, and the all-important Dark Lord could not well be ignored. Tolkien in his letters noted how Sauron casts just "a fleeting shadow" over the pages of The Hobbit; in Jackson's movie the shadow is darker and deeper.Entire new subplots are freely created and added to the story. The Elf Tauriel and her unlikely infatuation with one of the Dwarfs is clearly meant to add a love story where the book has none, and have at least ONE strong female character (no concern of Tolkien's when he wrote a story for children in the 1930s).The continued survival of ALL the protagonists despite their endless brushes with death doesn't just strain credibility -- it utterly and completely banishes and eliminates credibility. We are left with FANTASY action in the truest sense, to be enjoyed for choreography, not plausibility. If cats have nine lives, a Jacksonian Dwarf clearly enjoys a three-digit number of lives.So, viewed as an independent work, is this a good movie? Technically it is nothing short of brilliant, full of detail that can only be appreciated on the big screen. Smaug is, hands down, the best-designed movie dragon the world has yet seen. If I were a teenager instead of a ripe old 42, this wealth of fantasy action would probably have exited me no end. It is nice to see Legolas again, even if he is not in the book. I liked the sequences with the amorphous Sauron. Poor Evangeline Lily would however look better without those silly ears, which are simply too big and look just as fake as they are. Also, I'm not sure the hinted-at Elf-Dwarf romance adds much to the story. All things considered, I'll award Jackson's re-imagined "The Hobbit" seven stars.There were also seven stars in Durin's crown, for those of you who can understand the literary allusion ...

Reviewed by n/a 9 / 10

The Hobbit: The Desolation of Literature and Film-Making

*** This review may contain spoilers ***

Read more IMDb reviews


darkoring profile
darkoring May 12, 2018 at 5:02 am

please extended version... :)

mitthrawnuruodo86 profile
mitthrawnuruodo86 May 11, 2018 at 12:09 pm

Extended edition?

h0r4c3 profile
h0r4c3 May 11, 2018 at 11:37 am


skyhawk4141 profile
skyhawk4141 May 11, 2018 at 11:14 am

why its uploaded again?

nikhilsharma profile
nikhilsharma May 11, 2018 at 6:32 am

Pls upload :- Isle of Dogs(2018)

gandalfthegrey profile
gandalfthegrey May 6, 2018 at 12:56 pm

I want 3D Right NOW

villersam profile
villersam April 7, 2018 at 7:34 am

Can you upload 3D version link, thank you

gandalfthegrey profile
gandalfthegrey March 24, 2018 at 4:54 am

A 3D version would be appreciated. Ty

rrm39866 profile
rrm39866 March 23, 2018 at 10:03 pm

thanks :)z

panosol profile
panosol February 5, 2018 at 9:02 am


uoseq25 profile
uoseq25 January 26, 2018 at 4:18 am

thanks :)

szelung89 profile
szelung89 August 8, 2017 at 3:27 am

still waiting extended edition~

saad0 profile
saad0 May 19, 2017 at 5:17 am

any one know where i can download the EXTENDED EDITION of The Hobbit trilogy ??

saad0 profile
saad0 May 7, 2017 at 9:03 am

thnx OTTO , can u please upload the extended version ?

rishi7799 profile
rishi7799 May 4, 2017 at 12:21 pm

upload 3d version as soon as possible please iam waiting from a long time

chiefsurfer profile
chiefsurfer April 23, 2017 at 5:51 am

Yeah, as others suggested, extended edition will be nice

devinmaharjan profile
devinmaharjan April 4, 2017 at 4:16 am

need a 3d version

moviefreak789 profile
moviefreak789 January 12, 2017 at 9:01 am

upload the extended edition please?

fueldcruel profile
fueldcruel December 6, 2016 at 5:16 am

Please do a 3D version. Thanks in advance!

aela profile
aela November 4, 2016 at 9:02 pm


dilip_singh06 profile
dilip_singh06 September 26, 2016 at 1:36 pm

3d Version Plz.......

assail profile
assail August 29, 2016 at 6:44 am

Thank you, / YIFY!

yakushimichel profile
yakushimichel August 4, 2016 at 4:46 am

Hey, please upload the extended version

anj2016 profile
anj2016 July 22, 2016 at 2:49 pm

Why don't you upload the extended edition?

prabhdeep profile
prabhdeep July 8, 2016 at 6:28 am

Why don't you upload the extended edition?